Sniffing Out Code Smells in Java: Detection and Remedies

by

Code smells are indicators of potential problems in your code. They are not bugs, but rather symptoms of poor design and implementation choices that may lead to increased technical debt and difficulties in maintaining and extending the code in the future. This article will discuss common code smells in Java, how to detect them, and best practices for addressing these issues, complete with code examples.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Code smells are not necessarily bugs, but they can negatively affect the readability, maintainability, and extensibility of your code. Identifying and addressing code smells early in the development process can save time, effort, and resources in the long run. In this article, we will explore 12 common code smells in Java and provide guidance on how to detect and address them effectively.

Long Method

A long method is a method that contains too many lines of code, making it difficult to understand and maintain. Long methods are challenging to read, comprehend, and modify. They often contain complex logic and can be prone to errors.

Detection

You can detect long methods by looking for methods that exceed a certain number of lines of code. While there is no strict rule on the maximum number of lines a method should have, a common recommendation is to keep methods under 30 lines. However, this number can vary depending on the complexity and context of the code.

Example

The following example demonstrates a long method:

public class Customer {
    // ...
    public void placeOrder(Order order) {
        if (order.isEligibleForDiscount()) {
            // ...
            // Several lines of discount-related code
            //
        }

        if (order.requiresShipping()) {
            // ...
            // Several lines of shipping-related code
        }

        if (order.hasSpecialInstructions()) {
            // ...
            // Several lines of special instruction handling code
        }

        // ...
        // Additional lines of order processing code
    }
}

Best Practices

To address the long method code smell, you can apply the following best practices:

  • Refactor the method by breaking it into smaller, more focused methods that each perform a single responsibility. This makes the code more modular and easier to understand.
  • Consider using appropriate design patterns to better structure the code.

Refactored Example

The following example demonstrates a refactored version of the long method:

public class Customer {
    // ...
    public void placeOrder(Order order) {
        applyDiscountIfNeeded(order);
        handleShipping(order);
        processSpecialInstructions(order);
        // ...
        // Additional lines of order processing code
    }

    private void applyDiscountIfNeeded(Order order) {
        if (order.isEligibleForDiscount()) {
            // ...
            // Discount-related code
        }
    }

    private void handleShipping(Order order) {
        if (order.requiresShipping()) {
            // ...
            // Shipping-related code
        }
    }

    private void processSpecialInstructions(Order order) {
        if (order.hasSpecialInstructions()) {
            // ...
            // Special instruction handling code
        }
    }
}

Large Class

A large class is a class that contains too many lines of code, methods, or responsibilities. Large classes are difficult to understand, maintain, and can be prone to errors. They often violate the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP), a fundamental principle in object-oriented programming that states that a class should have only one reason to change.

Detection

Detecting a large class can be subjective, but you can look for classes that exceed a certain number of lines of code, methods, or responsibilities. You may also consider using tools like static code analyzers or code metrics to identify large classes automatically.

Example

The following example demonstrates a large class:

public class LargeClass {
    // ...
    // Several fields and methods related to user management
    // ...

    // Several fields and methods related to product management
    // ...

    // Several fields and methods related to order processing
    // ...
}

Best Practices

To address the large class code smell, you can apply the following best practices:

  • Refactor the class by breaking it into smaller, more focused classes that each have a single responsibility.
  • Consider using appropriate design patterns and principles, such as the Single Responsibility Principle and the Dependency Inversion Principle, to improve the modularity and maintainability of the code.

Refactored Example

The following example demonstrates a refactored version of the large class:

public class UserManager {
    // ...
    // Fields and methods related to user management
    // ...
}

public class ProductManager {
    // ...
    // Fields and methods related to product management
    // ...
}

public class OrderProcessor {
    // ...
    // Fields and methods related to order processing
    // ...
}

Feature Envy

Feature envy is a code smell where a method seems to be more interested in the data or behavior of another class than its own. This can lead to code that is harder to understand, maintain, and extend.

Detection

Feature envy can be detected by examining methods that frequently access data or methods from another class, especially if they perform little or no processing on their own class’s data. You can also use code analysis tools to help identify methods with high coupling to other classes.

Example

The following example demonstrates feature envy:

public class Order {
    private Customer customer;
    private List<Product> products;
    // ...

    public double calculateTotalPrice() {
        double totalPrice = 0.0;
        for (Product product : products) {
            totalPrice += product.getPrice();
        }
        return totalPrice;
    }
}

public class Customer {
    private List<Order> orders;
    // ...

    public double calculateTotalSpent() {
        double totalSpent = 0.0;
        for (Order order : orders) {
            totalSpent += order.calculateTotalPrice(); // Feature envy
        }
        return totalSpent;
    }
}

Best Practices

To address feature envy, consider the following best practices:

  • Move the envious method to the class whose data or behavior it is most interested in.
  • Consider using the “Tell, Don’t Ask” principle, where an object is instructed to perform an action rather than queried for its data and then acting on that data.

Refactored Example

The following example demonstrates a refactored version that addresses feature envy:

public class Order {
    private Customer customer;
    private List<Product> products;
    // ...

    public double calculateTotalPrice() {
        double totalPrice = 0.0;
        for (Product product : products) {
            totalPrice += product.getPrice();
        }
        return totalPrice;
    }
}

public class Customer {
    private List<Order> orders;
    // ...

    public double calculateTotalSpent() {
        double totalSpent = 0.0;
        for (Order order : orders) {
            totalSpent += order.calculateTotalPrice();
        }
        return totalSpent;
    }
}

Data Clumps

Data clumps are groups of data items that are frequently used together and passed around through various parts of the code. This can lead to code that is difficult to maintain and extend, as changes to the clump may need to be made in multiple places.

Detection

Data clumps can be detected by examining the code for groups of data items that are consistently used together and passed around as parameters or return values. You can also use code analysis tools to help identify data clumps in your codebase.

Example

The following example demonstrates data clumps:

public class OrderProcessor {
    public void processOrder(int productId, String productName, String productCategory, double productPrice) {
        // ...
        // Code that uses productId, productName, productCategory, and productPrice together
    }
}

public class OrderController {
    public void createOrder(int productId, String productName, String productCategory, double productPrice) {
        OrderProcessor orderProcessor = new OrderProcessor();
        orderProcessor.processOrder(productId, productName, productCategory, productPrice);
    }
}

Best Practices

To address data clumps, consider the following best practices:

  • Create a new class to represent the data clump, and refactor the code to use this new class instead of passing around individual data items.
  • Ensure that methods and functions operate on the new class directly, rather than requiring the data clump to be passed as separate parameters.

Refactored Example

The following example demonstrates a refactored version that addresses data clumps:

public class Product {
    private int id;
    private String name;
    private String category;
    private double price;

    // Constructor, getters, and setters omitted for brevity
}

public class OrderProcessor {
    public void processOrder(Product product) {
        // ...
        // Code that uses the Product object
    }
}

public class OrderController {
    public void createOrder(Product product) {
        OrderProcessor orderProcessor = new OrderProcessor();
        orderProcessor.processOrder(product);
    }
}

Primitive Obsession

Primitive obsession is a code smell where developers use primitive data types (such as integers, strings, or booleans) to represent complex domain concepts, instead of creating custom classes or data structures. This can lead to code that is difficult to understand, maintain, and extend.

Detection

Primitive obsession can be detected by examining the code for instances where primitive data types are used to represent complex concepts or domain entities. Look for cases where a group of primitive data types are used together to represent a single concept or where primitive data types are used in place of more descriptive, custom data structures.

Example

The following example demonstrates primitive obsession:

public class Order {
    private int customerId;
    private String customerName;
    private String customerEmail;
    // ...

    // Constructor, getters, and setters omitted for brevity
}

Best Practices

To address primitive obsession, consider the following best practices:

  • Create custom classes or data structures to represent complex domain concepts, and refactor the code to use these new constructs instead of primitive data types.
  • Consider using value objects or other design patterns to improve the structure and readability of your code.

Refactored Example

The following example demonstrates a refactored version that addresses primitive obsession:

public class Customer {
    private int id;
    private String name;
    private String email;

    // Constructor, getters, and setters omitted for brevity
}

public class Order {
    private Customer customer;
    // ...

    // Constructor, getters, and setters omitted for brevity
}

Switch Statements

Switch statements are often a code smell when they are used to determine the behavior of an object based on its type or state. This can lead to code that is difficult to understand, maintain, and extend, as adding new types or states may require changes to multiple switch statements throughout the codebase.

Detection

Switch statements can be detected by examining the code for instances where the behavior of an object is determined by its type or state using a switch statement. Look for cases where the same switch statement logic is duplicated in multiple places, or where adding a new type or state would require changes to existing switch statements.

Example

The following example demonstrates a switch statement code smell:

public class Employee {
    private String type;
    // ...

    public double calculateSalary() {
        double salary = 0.0;
        switch (type) {
            case "FULL_TIME":
                salary = calculateFullTimeSalary();
                break;
            case "PART_TIME":
                salary = calculatePartTimeSalary();
                break;
            case "INTERN":
                salary = calculateInternSalary();
                break;
            default:
                throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid employee type");
        }
        return salary;
    }
}

Best Practices

To address the switch statement code smell, consider the following best practices:

  • Use polymorphism to model different types or states as separate classes, and move the behavior into these classes.
  • Consider using appropriate design patterns, such as the Strategy pattern, to encapsulate the varying behavior in separate classes.

Refactored Example

The following example demonstrates a refactored version that addresses the switch statement code smell:

public abstract class Employee {
    // ...

    public abstract double calculateSalary();
}

public class FullTimeEmployee extends Employee {
    // ...

    @Override
    public double calculateSalary() {
        // Calculate full-time salary
    }
}

public class PartTimeEmployee extends Employee {
    // ...

    @Override
    public double calculateSalary() {
        // Calculate part-time salary
    }
}

public class InternEmployee extends Employee {
    // ...

    @Override
    public double calculateSalary() {
        // Calculate intern salary
    }
}

Conclusion

Identifying and addressing code smells is essential for maintaining a clean, efficient, and maintainable codebase. In this article, we have discussed common code smells in Java, provided examples, and suggested best practices for addressing these issues. By being vigilant and proactive in detecting and correcting code smells, you can improve the overall quality and maintainability of your software projects.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.